Infodemy as a form of competition of problems in public arenas

Main Article Content

Olha Kochubeynyk

Abstract

Urgency. The article is devoted to analysis of infodemia as special effect of communicative sphere of society, which accompanies the outbreak of coronavirus disease. Infodemia is interpreted as consequence of excessive production of information, as elaborating of extremely large amount of inaccurate and emotionally charged information. This situation makes it difficult to form adaptive behavioral strategies.


The present paper aims to: highlight mutual influence of technical, psychological and social factors. It is argued that combined effect of these factors ensured dominant status of this information in public arenas.


Results. Using theoretical analysis, it has shown hyperinflation of discourses in digital space is essential factor in destabilization of mental and psychological states of person. This caused integral changes in the order of sociality, since it weakened the power of the discourses of official institutions, impugned their right to claim the truth and reduced possibility of effectively resolving of situation. Lack of the trust in the professional competencies of relevant institutions (distrusting in actions of the healthcare system, distrusting in possibilities of political and economic stabilization in country, etc.) resulted in massive devaluation of objective or factual information (for example, about sources and means of disease spreading). On the other hand, under conditions of self-isolation, horizontal ties between members of society turned out to be a powerful channel for disseminating information (both reliable and unreliable). Specifics of functioning of digital communication space and high emotionally unstable background of society have significantly reduced possibilities for self-control and self-censorship of transmitted information. It has shown that end-to-end social process leading to emergence of infodemics is a “crisis of confidence”. It arises because incoherence of information originating from different sources destroys discursive border between the truth and the fake, and discrediting symbolic power of intellectuals to maintain the order of sociality leads to an increase in infantile protests in society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kochubeynyk, O. (2022). Infodemy as a form of competition of problems in public arenas. Problems of Political Psychology, 11(25), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.33120/popp-Vol25-Year2022-87
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Olha Kochubeynyk, Institute for Social and Political Psychology, NAES of Ukraine

Doctor of Sciences in Psychology, Chief Researcher of the Laboratory of Psychology of Political and Lаw Relationships

References

Bell, D. (1999). Gryadushcheye postindustryalnoye obshchestvo: Opyt sotsialnogo prognozirovaniya. Moscow: Akademiya. (in Russian)
Blumer, H. (2007). Sotsialnyye problemy kak kollektyvnoye povedeniye [Social problems as collective behavior]. Sotsialnyye problemy: konstruktsionystskoye prochteniye [Social Issues: A Constructionist Reading] (pp. 11–25). Kazan. (in Russian)
Broks, P. (2006). Understanding Popular Science. Open University Press. (in English)
Bucchi, M., & Neresini, F. (2008). Science and Public Participation. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Ch. 19 (рр. 449–472). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (in English)
Dunaieva, L. M., Коnоnеnkо, О. І., Smоkоvа, L. S., & Hudіmоvа, А. Ch. (Eds). (2021). Psykholohichne i sotsialne blahopoluchchia osobystosti ta naselennia v umovakh pandemii COVID-19: teoriia i praktyka [Psychological and social well-being of the individual and the population in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic: theory and practice],
Collection of scientific and practical materials. internet conference, Odesa, ONU named after I. I. Mechnikova, April 9, 2021. Odesa, ONU. (in Ukrainian)
Giddens, A. (2005). Ustroyeniye obshchestva: ocherk teorii strukturatsii [The disposition of society: an essay on the theory of structuration]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt. (in Russian)
Kastels, M. (2000). Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, kultura, obshchestvo [Information Age: Economy, Culture, Society]. Moscow. (in Russian)
Khylhartner, S., & Bosk, Ch. L. (2000). Rost i upadok sotsialnykh problem: kontseptsiya publichnykh aren [The rise and fall of social problems: the concept of public arenas]. Sredstva massovoy kommunikatsii i sotsialnyye problemy [Mass media and social problems] (pp. 18–53). Kazan. (in Russian)
Masuda, Y. (1981). The Information Society as Post-Industrial Society. Washington: World Future Society. (in English)
Naisbitt, J. (2005). Vysokaya tekhnologiya, glubokaya gumannost: Tekhnolohii i nashi poiski smysla [High technology, deep humanity: Technology and our search for meaning]. Moscow: AST. (in Russian)
Önnerfors, A. (2020). Konspirationsteorier och covid-19: mekanismerna bakom en snabbväxande samhällsutmaning. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap. Enheten för skydd mot informationspåverkan. Advant. (in English)
Sliusarevskyi, M. M., Naidonova, L. A., Voznesenska, O. L. (Eds). (2020). Dosvid perezhyvannia pandemii COVID-19: dystantsiini psykholohichni doslidzhennia, dystantsiina psykholohichna pidtrymka [The experience of experiencing the pandemic: remote psychological research, remote psychological support], Materials of the online seminars on April 23, 2020 "The experience of quarantine: remote psychological help and support" and on May 15, 2020 "Remote psychological research in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic and quarantine". Kyiv: ISPP NAPN Ukrainy. (in Ukrainian)
Toffler, A. (2002). Shok budushchego [A Future Shock]. Minsk: AST. (in Russian)