Ідентичнісний вимір соціальної резильєнтності: визначення, підходи, можливості прогнозування
Main Article Content
Abstract
The relevance of the article is determined by the challenges that arise in Ukrainian society during the experience of the war. In search of an answer to how social identity and resilience are correlated in Ukrainian society, research is analyzed within the framework of social identity theory, which offers explanatory models of the interdependence of these two phenomena.
The purpose of the article is to determine the social-identity dimension of resilience, analyze the main ideas and approaches to its study, and determine the possibilities of their application in Ukrainian realities. Methodology – analysis of articles and scientific works carried out within the framework of the theory of social identity with the aim of studying social identity as a component of resilience.
The results of the source analysis showed that during the experience of emergency events in social groups, a new type of common social identity can be formed, which is associated with the awareness and feeling of experiencing a common fate. This kind of identity is formed spontaneously in times of emergency around notions of shared destiny. This identity is a source of norms and rules of behavior in the group, extends to all members of the community, even if they are not directly involved in the events, does not disappear after the end of the emergency situation, serves as a source of ideas about own and group effectiveness, motivates to provide and receive support, is sensitive to external sources of influence, can be reinforced from the outside thanks to communications that inspire trust. Based on these characteristics, J. Drury offered recommendations that help to develop, predict and form social identity. In Ukraine today, we observe a resilient shared social identity based on the experience of a common fate and positive ideas about the ingroup. This type of Ukrainian identity has a spontaneous character, arose as a group's response to a threat, serves as a source of norms and rules, community-government communication in terms of identity occurs spontaneously and there are no signs of systematicity.
We see the prospects for further research in a deeper analysis of the results of foreign studies and in empirical studies of the content and features of Ukrainian resilience and common social identity.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Лазос, Г. П. (2019). Теоретико-методологічна модель резильєнтності як основа побудови психотехнології її розвитку. Організаційна психологія. Економічна психологія, 2-3 (17), 77–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31108/2.2019.3.17.9.
Титаренко, Т., & Ларіна, Т. (2009). Життєстійкість особистості: соціальна необхідність та безпека. Київ: Марич. Взято з http://lib.iitta.gov.ua/9065/
Коробка, Л., & Васютинський, В. (2019). Спільнота в умовах воєнного конфлікту: психологічні стратегії адаптації. Кропивницький: Імекс-ЛТД.
Drury, J. (2012). Collective resilience in mass emergencies and disasters: A social identity model. In J. Jetten, C. Haslam and S. Haslam (Eds.), The social cure: Identity, health, and well-being (pp. 195–215). Psychology Press.
Drury, J., Carter, H., Cocking, C., Ntontis, E., Tekin Guven, S., & Amlôt, R. (2019). Facilitating Collective Psychosocial Resilience in the Public in Emergencies: Twelve Recommendations Based on the Social Identity Approach. Front Public Health. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00141.
Drury, J., Cocking, Ch., & Reicher, S. (2009). The Nature of Collective Resilience: Survivor Reactions to the 2005 London Bombings. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 27, 66–95.
Drury, J., Reicher, S., Schofield, D., & Langston, P. (2008). Effects of Social Identity in Responses to Emergency Mass Evacuations, 2004–2007. [data collection]. UK Data Service. SN: 5987, DOI: 10.5255/UKDA-SN-5987-1
Penic, S., Drury, J., & Bady, Z. (2022). Collective resilience. In G. Elcheroth, & N. de Mel (Eds.), In the Shadow of Transitional Justice. Cross-national Perspectives on the Transformative Potential of Remembrance. Routledge.
Reicher, S. D. (1982). The determination of collective behaviour In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (рр. 41–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reicher, S. D. (1984). The St. Pauls riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14 (1), 1–21.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.