Social solidarity in the context of searching ways to achieve and preserve the integrity of society: interdisciplinary analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
The relevance of scientific researchis determined by the need to deepen socio-psychological ideas about social solidarity, its structuring and features of functioning in conditions of continuous differentiation, disintegration and conflict and finding ways to achieve and preserve the integrity of society.
The purpose of the research is to study the structuring of social solidarity with an emphasis on modern approaches and prospects for its development within social psychology in the context of deepening social differentiation and transformational changes in Ukrainian society.
Methodology and scientific approaches: metatheoretical concept of dialogical form of solidarity (Habermas, 2000); provisions of the theory of social comparison, according to which the formation of large social groups is the basis of identification as an assessment by their members of the accuracy of their personal beliefs and views (Festinger, 1999); provisions on social transformations, which act as a «cross-cutting framework of analysis» (Bogomolova, 2002); provisions on the total individualization of life, the formation of a reflective subject (Beck, 2000); defining communities as personal networks that are no longer limited to geographical areas and have the ability to provide various types of support that are manifestations of solidarity (Wellman, & Wortley, 1990).
The main results. It is determined that social solidarity is a specific property of society that arises spontaneously or managed on the basis of integration of personal potentials of solidarity of the majority of its members, due to which there is a convergence of social processes on a common goal and cohesion at large groups. It is established that solidarity as a cohesion of large groups enables effective problem solving and achievement of sustainable development goals; that there is a need for a new look at the concepts and mechanisms of solidarity is due to the fact that many phenomena of modern solidarity processes today can not be explained solely on the basis of classical theories of solidarity.It is generally accepted that the concept of «new solidarity» is lost, which loses territorial, class involvement, ceases to reproduce the constant commonality of interests and values.
Conclusions. Psychological structuring of social solidarity makes it possible to distinguish its features on different social dimensions. Emphasis on social interaction, communication, the role of trust, social responsibility and tolerance in the processes of solidarity reveals the specifics of the multi-vector plane of achieving and maintaining social solidarity. The individual forms his conscious attitude to certain prospects of social life, the psychological center of which is the «personal potential of solidarity."Solidarity as a cohesion of large social groups is achieved through mechanisms such as the experience of participation, the polylogue of communities, upward and downward initiatives and the dynamic balance of processes of competition and cooperation of communities.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Bauman Z. (2002) Individualizirovannoye obshchestvo [Individualized society]. M.: Logos. (in Russian)
Bek U. (2000). Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modern [Risk society. On the way to another modernity]. Per. s nem. V. Sedelnika i N. Fedorovoy; Poslesl. A. Filippova. M.: Progress-Traditsiya. (in Russian)
Bogomolova N. N. (2002) Psikhologiya bolshikh sotsialnykh grupp: novyye sudby, novyye podkhody. [Psychology of large social groups: new destinies, new approaches]. N. N. Bogomolova, A. I. Dontsov, T. V. Folomeyeva. Sotsialnaya psikhologiya v sovremennom mire. [Social psychology in the modern world]. Moskva: Aspekt Press. 132–147. (in Russian)
Brunkhorst, Hauke (2005), Solidarity From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community, Cambridge/London: MIT Press Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262907398_Solidarity_From_Civic_Friendship_to_a_Global_Legal_Community_CambridgeLondon_MIT_Press_2005 (in English)
Cheong, Pauline Hope, Rosalind Edwards, Harry Goulbourne, and John Solomos. (2007). “Immigration, Social Cohesion and Social Capital: A Critical Review.” Critical Social Policy 27: 24–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018307072206 Retrieved from https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/immigration-social-cohesion-and-social-capital-a-critical-review (in English)
Davies & Savulescu (2019) Solidarity and Responsibility in Health Care. Public Health Ethics. Volume 12. No 2. 133-144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phz008 Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/phe/article/12/2/133/5528519 (in English)
Dukhnevych V. M. (2013) Pryntsypy zabezpechennya ta orhanizatsiyi dialohichnoyi vzayemodiyi. [Principles of providing and organizing dialogic interaction]. Aktualʹni problemy psykholohiyi. Zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ Instytutu psykholohiyi imeni H. S. Kostyuka NAPN Ukrayiny. [Current problems of psychology. Collection of scientific works of the GS Kostyuk Institute of Psychology of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine.]. Tom 7. Ekolohichna psykholohiya. Vypusk 34. Retrieved from http://appsychology.org.ua/data/jrn/v7/i34/11.pdf (іn Ukrainian)
Festinger L. (1999). Teoriya kognitivnogo dissonansa. [The theory of cognitive dissonance.]. Per. s angl. SPb.: Yuventa. Retrieved from http://kyiv-heritage-guide.com/sites/default/files/%d0%a4%d0%95%d0%a1%d0%a2%d0%98%d0%9d%d0%93%d0%95%d0%a0%20-%20%d0%a2%d0%b5%d0%be%d1%80%d0%b8%d1%8f%20%d0%ba%d0%be%d0%b3%d0%bd%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b8%d0%b2%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%b3%d0%be%20%d0%b4%d0%b8%d1%81%d1%81%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%b0%d0%bd%d1%81%d0%b0.pdf (in Russian)
Filippov A. F. (2008). Chuvstvennost i mobilizatsiya. K probleme politicheskoy esteziologii. De Futuro, ili Istoriya budushchego. [Sensuality and mobilization. On the problem of political aesthesiology. De Futuro, or History of the Future.]. pod red. D. A. Andreyeva i V. B. Pro zorova. M.: Politicheskiy klass, AIRO. 134-156; 207-231. Retrieved from https://www.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/content_document/176862125 (in Russian)
Giddens E. (2004) Transformatsiya intimnosti. [Transformation of Intimacy]. SPb.: Piter. (in Russian)
Gofman, A. (2019). Tradition, morality і solidarity в Durkheim's theory. Istanbul University Journal of Sociology, 39, 25-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2019.39.1.0007 Взято из https://www.isras.ru/index.php?page_id=1198&id=7199 (in English)
Habermas YU. (2000). Strukturni peretvorennya u sferi vidkrytosti: doslidzhennya katehoriyi hromadyansʹke suspilʹstvo. [Structural transformations in the field of openness: a study of the category of civil society]. Lʹviv: Litopys. (іn Ukrainian)
Hordiyenko V. I. (2008) Problema dialohu v umovakh realiy «psykholohichnoho suspilʹstva». [The problem of dialogue in the realities of "psychological society"]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Psykholohichni, pedahohichni nauky ta sotsialʹna robota. [Scientific notes of NaUKMA. Psychological, pedagogical sciences and social work]. T. 84. 38-45. (іn Ukrainian)
Hordiyenko V. I. (2009) Modeli komunikatyvnoho protsesu v suchasniy psykholohiyi ta yikhniy potentsial u poyasnenni dialohichnosti spilkuvannya. [Models of communicative process in modern psychology and their potential in explaining the dialogic nature of communication.]. Naukovi zapysky NAUKMA. Psykholohichni, pedahohichni nauky ta sotsialʹna robota. [Scientific notes of NAUKMA. Psychological, pedagogical sciences and social work]. T. 97. 55-60. (іn Ukrainian)
Larsen, Christian Albrekt. (2013). The Rise and Fall of Social Cohesion: The Construction and Deconstruction of Social Trust in the US, UK, Sweden and Denmark. Oxford: OUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681846.001.0001 Retrieved from https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681846.001.0001/acprof-9780199681846 (in English)
Lobanova A. S., Kolomoyetsʹ T. H. (2016) Solidaryzatsiya profesiynykh vidnosyn u sferi pratsi v umovakh suspilʹnykh vyklykiv. [Solidarity of professional relations in the field of work in the face of social challenges]. Rynok pratsi ta zaynyatistʹ naselennya. [Labor market and employment.]. № 1(46). Instytut pidhotovky kadriv derzhavnoyi sluzhby zaynyatosti Ukrayiny. [Institute of Personnel Training of the State Employment Service of Ukraine.]. 51-55. Retrieved from https://ipk.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/1-20161.pdf (іn Ukrainian)
Orban-Lembryk L. E. (2004) Sotsialʹna psykholohiya: pidruchnyk: u 2 kn. [Social psychology: textbook: in 2 books.]. K.: Lybidʹ. Kn. 1: Sotsialʹna psykholohiya osobystosti i spilkuvannya. (іn Ukrainian)
Ovcharov A. O. (2011) Mekhanizmy intehratsiyi-dyferentsiatsiyi yak sotsialʹno-psykholohichni faktory evolyutsiyi ideolohiy. [Mechanisms of integration-differentiation as socio-psychological factors of evolution of ideologies.]. Zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ. Kyyiv: Milenium. Vyp.11. 149-153. (іn Ukrainian)
Rorti R. (1996) Sluchaynost, ironiya i solidarnost. Randomness, Irony and Solidarity. Perevod s angl. I. Khestanovoy, R. Khestanova. M.: Russkoye fenomenologicheskoye obshchestvo. [Russian phenomenological society.]. (in Russian)
Savulescu J. (2018). Golden Opportunity, Reasonable Risk and Personal Responsibility for Health. Journal of Medical Ethics, 44, 59-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104428 Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29146712/ (in English)
Sellberg, My M.,[Cathy Wilkinson, and Garry D. Peterson. (2015). “Resilience Assessment: A Useful Approach to Navigate Urban Sustainability Challenges.” Ecology and Society 20 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07258-20014 Retrieved from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss1/art43/ (in English)
Sivers Z. F. (2017) Prykladni aspekty stanovlennya politykopravovoyi svidomosti molodi : posibnyk. [Applied aspects of the formation of political and legal consciousness of youth: a guide.]. Z. F. Sivers, V. M. Dukhnevych, O. YU. Osadʹko; za zah. red. Z. F. Sivers; Nats. akad. ped. nauk Ukrayiny, In-t sots. ta polit. psykholohiyi. Kropyvnytsʹkyy: Imeks-LTD. Retrieved from http://psy-lpr.at.ua/Materials/SiversPosib2017.pdf (іn Ukrainian)
Stjerno (2004). Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Publisher: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490378 Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/solidarity-in-europe/0033B1F96321CA4DB5F7A40D37F11D27 (in English)
Sushyy O. V. (2018) Sotsialʹna psykholohiya natsiyetvorennya: kontseptualʹni zasady i metodolohichni pryntsypy doslidzhennya. [Social psychology of nation-building: conceptual principles and methodological principles of research.]. Naukovi studiyi iz sotsialʹnoyi ta politychnoyi psykholohiyi. [Scientific studies in social and political psychology]. Vyp. 41 (44). 3-19. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330556444_Susij_OV_Socialna_psihologia_nacietvorenna_konceptualni_zasadi_i_metodologicni_principi_doslidzenna_OVSusij_Naukovi_studii_iz_socialnoi_ta_politicnoi_psihologii_-_2018_-_Vip_41_44_-_S_3-19 (іn Ukrainian)
Tajfel H. (1979) Individuals and groups in social psychology. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 183-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979.tb00324.x Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1980-27903-001 (in English)
Tatenko V. O. (2020) Sotsialʹna psykholohiya natsiyetvorennya: subʺyektno-vchynkovyy pidkhid: monohrafiya. [Social psychology of nation-building: subject-action approach: monograph.]. V. O. Tatenko; Natsionalʹna akademiya pedahohichnykh nauk Ukrayiny, Instytut sotsialʹnoyi ta politychnoyi psykholohiyi. [National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Social and Political Psychology]. Kropyvnytsʹkyy : Imeks-LTD. Retrieved from https://ispp.org.ua/2021/02/19/tatenko-v-o-monografiya-socialna-psixologiya- naciyetvorennya-subyektno-vchinkovij-pidxid/ (іn Ukrainian)
Tytarenko T. M. (2014) Psykholohichni praktyky konstruyuvannya zhyttya v umovakh postmodernoyi sotsialʹnosti : monohrafiya. [Psychological practices of constructing life in postmodern society: a monograph.]. T. M. Tytarenko, O. M. Kochubeynyk, K. O. Cheremnykh; Natsionalʹna akademiya pedahohichnykh nauk Ukrayiny, Instytut sotsialʹnoyi ta politychnoyi psykholohiyi. [National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Social and Political Psychology.]. K.: Milenium. Retrieved from http://www.ispp.org.ua/backup_ispp/1423061573.pdf (іn Ukrainian)
Urri Dzh. (2012). Sotsiologiya za predelami obshchestv: vidy mobilnosti dlya XXI stoletiya [Sociology Beyond Societies: Types of Mobility for the 21st Century]. [Tekst] per. s angl. D. Kralechkina; nats. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». [nat. issled. University Higher School of Economics]. M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. Retrieved from https://id.hse.ru/data/2012/06/20/1255154102/%D0%A3%D1%80%D1%80%D0%B8.pdf (in Russian)
Vasyutynsʹkyy V. (2010) Psykholohichni vymiry spilʹnoty: monohrafiya. [Psychological dimensions of community: a monograph]. K.: Zoloti vorota. Retrieved from http://www.ispp.org.ua/backup_ispp/1426077022.pdf (іn Ukrainian)
Wellman, Barry & Scot Wortley (1990). “Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support” American Journal of Sociology 96: 558–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/229572 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2781064 (in English)
Wilde, L. (2007). Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Contemp Polit Theory 6, 117-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300271 Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300271 (in English)
Zhyttyevyy svit i psykholohichna bezpeka lyudyny v umovakh suspilʹnykh zmin. [The world of life and psychological security of the person in the conditions of social changes]. (2020). Referatyvnyy opys roboty. M. M. Slyusarevsʹkyy, L. A. Naydʹonova, T. M. Tytarenko, V. O. Tatenko, P. P. Hornostay, O. M. Kochubeynyk, B. P. Lazorenko. Kyyiv: Talkom. Retrieved from http://gorn.kiev.ua/DerjPremia2019.pdf (іn Ukrainian)