Youth citizenship competence in the context of current transformations in the educational environment
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and purpose. Research on the development of youth citizenship competence in the educational environment interaction process in the context of current educational transformations is determined by the importance of further conceptualization of the educational environment as a socio-psychological factor of citizenship competence development, as well as identification of the practices beneficial for students’ citizenship competences formation and their implementation means. The article outlines current transformations in education and their consequences for the conceptualization and development of citizenship competence. It also presents the findings of the survey of the educational agents’ attitudes regarding interaction practices in the educational environment beneficial for youth citizenship competences development.
Findings. Transformations in the educational environment caused by its rapid digitalization and resulted in technologization of education, demonopolization of knowledge, delegitimization of authority and dehierachization of education, transform educational interaction practices which are now supposed to primarily promote students’ discoursive experience, critical reflection, self-management, self-evaluation, and self-identification. The empirical research of the educational agents’ attitudes regarding educational interaction practices that facilitate youth citizenship competencies development conducted in the framework of the transformative learning theory has actualized the following tendencies in the attitudes of the students: orientation towards autonomous independent thinking, reflection, and interaction based on tolerance and interest to social differences.
Practical application of the results relates to the processes of evaluation and transformation of the interaction practices to create educational environment that would facilitate youth citizenship competence development. The peculiarities of the educational agents’ attitudes identified in the course of the survey will be instrumental in the process.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Poznyak, S. (2020) Yaki gromadianski kompetentsiyi potrebuie vzaiemodiya v osvitniomu seredovyschi: nastaovlennya studentskoyi ta uchnivskoyi molodi [What citizenship competencies are necessary for interaction in the educational environment: attitudes of university and secondary school students]. Gabitus, 20, p. 255-260. (In Ukrainian).
Bersand. A. The crisis as an opportunity to learn. Or: “Collated civic education” in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Social Science Education, 2020. Vol. 19. C. 8-14.
Bloland, H. G. (2005) Whatever Happened to Postmodernism in Higher Education?: No Requiem in the New Millennium. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(2):121-150
Calleja, C. (2014) Jack Mezirov’s conceptualization of adult transformative learning. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, Vol.20, № 1, p. 117-136.
Lester, S. (1996) Learning for the 21st Century. In Kincheloe, Sternberg & Weil (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Educational Standards. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-Clio. http://www.devmts.demon.co.uk/lrg21st.htm.
Mezirow, J. (1997) “Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice.” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, № 74.
Oxenham, M. (2013) Higher Education in Liquid Modernity. Routledge, 242 p.
Pawlak, K. and Bergquist, W. Engaging Experience in a Postmodern Age. https://psychology.edu/about/four-models-of-adult-education/. Accessed 2017.
Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008) The state and social capital an institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, № 40(4). p. 441–459.
ten Dam, G., et al. (2011) Measuring Young People’s Citizenship Competences. European Journal of Education, Vol. 46, № 3. p. 354-372.
Westheimer, J. (2008) What kind of citizenship? Democratic dialogues in education. Education Canada, Vol. 48 (3). p. 6-10.
Zuboff, S. (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism. NY: Public Affairs, 478 p.